Casey Campbell v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al.

Are employer statements on religious discrimination that are included in the complaint and admitted in the answer binding judicial admissions in the de novo review of a federal employee’s Title VII religious discrimination claim?

Is a Final Agency Decision that was not vacated competent evidence in the de novo review of a federal employee’s Title VII religious discrimination/hostile work environment claim?

As “[t]he loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury” and as “[Title VII] gives [religious practices] favored treatment”, can discrimination or harassment of a federal employee based on religion be considered “the ordinary tribulations of the workplace”?

Was the law prohibiting religious discrimination in the workplace clearly established in 2013 to preclude qualified immunity as a defense to a claim for damages under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act?

Is qualified immunity a defense to a claim for equitable relief under Title VII or under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act?

Is a sanction that abridges substantive rights for a non-willful violation of a local rule proper under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 83(a)(2).