Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Michelle Smith v. Peter B. Krupp, Judge, Superior Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk County, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, No. 23-1004 · judgment August 21, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether the Rooker Feldman Doctrine was intended to shield Defendants; in a Title 42 section 1983 claim, in immunity for their actions of fraudulently initiating and harmfully conducting State Court proceedings with a Want of Jurisdiction and Usurpation of Power?
-
Whether the Rooker Feldman Doctrine applies to cases where the Petitioner alleged that a “Fraud of the Court” was perpetrated on the court, by Respondents French, Pinheiro, and Bigley?
-
Whether the Rooker Feldman Doctrine applies to this independent claim in Federal Court where the Petitioner seeks redress, not for a State Court Judgment that has been paid, but rather for the injuries inflicted by the MA State Court Proceedings that constituted Want of Juris diction and a Subversion of Congress / State? (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michelle Smith
For respondent
Labdhi Sheth Desai
Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 01 2024Petition DENIED.
- Mar 12 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
- Feb 29 2024Waiver of right of respondent Krupp, et al. to respond filed.
- Feb 29 2024Waiver of right of respondent Ann Pinheiro to respond filed.
- Nov 16 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 29, 2024)