Palani Karupaiyan v. Lee Solomon, et al.

Petitioner’s prayed reliefs were i) National importance of having the US Supreme Court decide or conflict with USSC ruling, or importance of similarly situated over millions of citizens or the first impression is raised at USSC. ii) Petitioners’ property rights under 42USC§ 1982 and Hindu Successive Act were denied when USSC ruled in Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc., 396 US 229-S.Ct 1969@237 “Section1982 f42 USC§19821 covers the right "to inherit, purchase, lease, sell. hold, and convey real and personal property." iii) Local Govts/Foreign Govt violating, Parents rights (14th amendment) which were ruled by USSC under Troxel v. Granville. 530 US 57 and Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 US 702, 720. iv) Local Govts illegally taken away Petitioners property without Jury trial. v) Local Govts illegally issued arrestfedl warrant without Jury trial. vi) NJ Court violated the Indian Family Court Order Further/additionally Petitioner’s prayed over 30 reliefs were as Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition or alternative so the questions were part of three test condition requirement of the Writs.