In Re Henry L. Klein

On April 14,2023, Axon v. FTC was decided along with SEC v. Cochran, leaving open only where the fundamental challenges may be heard ("Axon"). Given Axon's significance to issues raised in Klein v. ODC, 23-261, on October 10, Petitioner filed a Request to Enforce the Supremacy Clause with Axon being the supreme law of the land, Appx G. On October 12, the Louisiana Supreme Court treated the Request as a Petition for Rehearing and DENIED without reasons, Appx A. In essence, the May 18 Per Curiam gave absolute deference to Louisiana's attorneyregulation scheme1. Q-l: Did the Louisiana Supreme Court violate the Constitution's Supremacy Clause by DENYING Petitioner's Request to enforce Axon v . FTC and SEC v. Cochran as the supreme law of the land, preempting Louisiana's Disciplinary Rule XIX? Q-2: Does Louisiana's attorney-regulation scheme provide a"... meaningful judicial review ..." in the form of 20 minutes oral argument on a record devoid of Article III adjudicators and hearing transcripts? Q-3. Given the combination of prosecutorial and adjudicatory roles in a single ODC deputy, was Petitioner subjected to "... an illegitimate proceeding 1 "Deferential review is particularly concerning given [ALJ] tendency to overwhelmingly agree with their respective agency's decisions.", Axon concurrence by Justice THOMAS at n. 1.