Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Lynn Hamlet v. Officer Hoxie

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 21-11937 · judgment November 9, 2022


Certiorari denied · December 11, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 7% cert probability (95% interval 5%–11%)

Before the decision, about 1.7× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and an Eleventh Circuit decision below.

Question presented

Petitioner Lynn Hamlet—an elderly man with visible open wounds on his ankles resulting from diabetes—suffered a life-threatening bacterial infection after Officer Brandon Hoxie trapped him in a backedup shower filled with another person’s feces, removed from his cell any method by which he could clean the excrement from his wounds, and barred him from showering for a week while human waste festered in his sores. Hamlet brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging Officer Hoxie’s conduct as violating the Eighth Amendment. The Eleventh Circuit held that Officer Hoxie was entitled to qualified immunity because there was no circuit precedent holding that the Eighth Amendment bars prison officials from forcing an incarcerated person to have gratuitous contact with human waste under these precise circumstances. The questions presented are: I. Whether it is “clearly established” for purposes of qualified immunity that the Eighth Amendment bars a prison official from forcing a person with diabetes and open wounds to endure prolonged and unnecessary exposure to feces. II. Whether the Court should overrule Procunier v. Navarette, 434 U.S. 555 (1978), and hold that qualified immunity under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 does not extend to a suit alleging that a prison guard subjected the plaintiff to unlawful conditions of confinement, because similar state officials were not immune from similar suits at common law.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jonathan D. Hacker
O'Melveny & Myers LLP

For respondent
Henry Charles Whitaker
Florida Office of the Attorney General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 3 conferences

Linked docket
22A972

Proceedings

  1. Dec 11 2023
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 01 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
  3. Nov 27 2023
    Rescheduled.
  4. Nov 14 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
  5. Nov 13 2023
    Reply of petitioner Lynn Hamlet filed. (Distributed)
  6. Oct 27 2023
    Brief of respondent Officer Hoxie in opposition filed.
  7. Sep 19 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 27, 2023.
  8. Sep 18 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 27, 2023 to October 27, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
  9. Aug 28 2023
    Response Requested. (Due September 27, 2023)
  10. Aug 09 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
  11. Aug 02 2023
    Waiver of right of respondent Officer Hoxie to respond filed.
  12. Jun 29 2023
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 2, 2023)
  13. Jun 20 2023
    Application (22A972) denied by Justice Thomas.
  14. Jun 15 2023
    Application (22A972) to extend further the time from June 29, 2023 to July 29, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
  15. May 05 2023
    Application (22A972) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 29, 2023.
  16. May 03 2023
    Application (22A972) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 30, 2023 to July 29, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.