Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Devon Tinius, et al. v. Luke Choi, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 22-7047, 22-7048, 22-7049, 22-7050, 22-7051, 22-7052, 22-7053 · judgment July 7, 2023

Certiorari denied · February 20, 2024
Pre-decision estimate: 3% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Whether the District of Columbia’s curfew law is unconstitutional because it violates fundamental rights and because it is overbroad and void for vagueness.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
James Arthur DeVita

For respondent
Holly Michelle Johnson
DC Office of the Attorney General

Case

Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Order
Order list, February 20, 2024 · Certiorari denied

Proceedings

  1. Feb 20 2024
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jan 10 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
  3. Dec 18 2023
    Waiver of right of respondent District of Columbia, Luke Choi, Carlton Smith, Jose Maneechai, Jermaine Perez, Carlin Kern, Briana Varga to respond filed.
    Main Document
  4. Dec 12 2023
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2024)
    PetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of Service