Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General v. Azucena Aracely Lazo-Gavidia, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 20-2306 · judgment July 12, 2023

GVR'd · June 24, 2024
Pre-decision estimate: 18% cert probability (95% interval 12%–26%)

Before the decision, about 4.3× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a federal-government petitioner, counsel who has won certiorari before, and a Fourth Circuit decision below.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General

For respondent
Mary Lynn Anna Tedesco
Tedesco Legal, PC

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 3 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Jul 26 2024
    Judgment Issued.
    Main Document
  2. Jun 24 2024
    Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Campos-Chaves v. Garland, 602 U. S. ___ (2024).
  3. Jun 17 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
  4. May 14 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
  5. Apr 29 2024
    Brief of respondents Azucena Aracely Lazo-Gavidia, et al. filed.
  6. Mar 29 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 29, 2024.
  7. Mar 22 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 29, 2024 to April 29, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
  8. Mar 01 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 29, 2024.
  9. Feb 28 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 28, 2024 to March 29, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
  10. Jan 29 2024
    Response Requested. (Due February 28, 2024)
  11. Jan 24 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
  12. Dec 07 2023
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 10, 2024)
  13. Dec 07 2023
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.