Christopher M. Hunt v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas

Conflict concerns the international sover­ eignty of the United States of America and sovereignty of all U.S. Courts effecting millions of homeowners: which court resolves an irreconcilable conflict of juris­ diction between the federal courts and state courts? Instant case: is a federal court to hold the mandate while investigating fraud and enforce its jurisdiction over state by disregarding its rule “not to disturb state orders” even when nullity and contemptuous to federal courts, or, does the state disregard its unconstitutional rule of no review of a superior court nullity and illegal supersedeas bond obtained by fraud on the courts and is in contempt of federal court jurisdiction?

How do federal courts properly enforce juris­ diction and close the legal loophole being premeditatedly exploited by a white-collar criminal international company (Deutsche) operating illegally in the United States? NOTE: Motion to Combine/Join filed with instant third Writ with the two requests of Rehearing 23-8 (scheduled 11/17/23) USCA11 and 23-43 from Supreme Court of Georgia so all three combined. Homeowner will be able to hire counsel if Writs are accepted and combined/joined. Honorable Court can resolve the is­ sue that all fifty states attorneys general are being asked to petition Court per Exhibit 1 in accompanying Motion. Unlike TYLER v. HENNEPIN COUNTY MN that ended decades of unconstitutional theft by state governments, Court’s ruling “ounce of prevention is