Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Stephen Michael Michuda v. Minnesota

IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Minnesota, No. A22-1383 · judgment March 27, 2023

Dismissed · November 13, 2023

For petitioner
Stephen M. Michuda

For respondent
Adam Edward Petras
Hennepin County Attorney's Office

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

Nov 13 2023
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Oct 25 2023
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
Oct 23 2023
Waiver of right of respondent Minnesota to respond filed.
Main Document
Sep 13 2023
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2023)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Petition Appendix Proof of Service Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Petition Appendix Proof of Service