Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re William B. Jolley
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
Do Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) decisions of Veteran and Whistleblower appeals fail for lack of “due process” where 5 C.F.R. f 1201.57(d), states “the Board will not consider matters described at 5 U.S.C. | 7701(c)(2) in an appeal covered by this section.”?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
William B. Jolley
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Linked docket
23M34
Order
Order list, January 8, 2024 · Mandamus denied
Proceedings
- Jan 08 2024Petition DENIED.
- Dec 13 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
- Dec 08 2023Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Nov 20 2023Motion (23M34) for leave to proceed as a veteran Granted.
- Nov 01 2023MOTION (23M34) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
- Oct 25 2023Motion (23M34) for leave to proceed as a veteran filed.
- Oct 25 2023Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due December 20, 2023)