Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Realtime Data LLC, dba IXO v. Fortinet, Inc., et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 21-2251, 21-2291 · judgment August 2, 2023


Certiorari denied · January 8, 2024
Pre-decision estimate: 7% cert probability (95% interval 4%–10%)

Before the decision, about 1.7× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a Federal Circuit decision below, and down for a business respondent.

Question presented

Section 101 of the Patent Act of 1952, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., provides that “any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof,” is eligible for a patent. 35 U.S.C. § 101. This Court issued a trio of decisions relating to Section 101 between 2010 and 2014, culminating in the Court’s decision in Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l, 573 U.S. 208 (2014). There, the Court held, among other things, that abstract ideas are not patentable under Section 101. Id. at 217. Petitioner Realtime Data LLC, d/b/a IXO (“Realtime”) holds multiple patents relating to improvements in the functioning of computer systems through novel uses of data compression techniques. Seven such patents, comprising 211 individual patent claims, were before the Federal Circuit, which held that all 211 claims of all seven patents were ineligible for patent protection under the Court-created exception to Section 101 for abstract ideas. The question presented in this case is as follows: Whether the claimed inventions are ineligible for patent protection under the abstract-idea exception to Section 101.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Brian David Ledahl
Russ, August & Kabat

For respondent
Alton George Burkhalter
Burkhalter Kessler Clement & George LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Proceedings

  1. Jan 08 2024
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 20 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
  3. Dec 13 2023
    Brief amici curiae of Alan J. Heinrich, et al. filed.
  4. Dec 04 2023
    Waiver of right of respondent MongoDB Inc. to respond filed.
  5. Nov 28 2023
    Waiver of right of respondent Panzura, Inc. to respond filed.
  6. Oct 31 2023
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 13, 2023)