Sharan Garlapati v. Brigham & Women's Hospital, et al.

Does the fundamental right to privacy still exist in our modern digital age, and do conspiracies against rights, acts of “cyberstalking” and stalking-by-proxy constitute illegal conduct? Could we view activities such as psychological manipulation, coercion, deliber­ ate obstruction of justice, witness intimidation, deny­ ing someone the ability to obtain appropriate clinical care or engage in employment, barring an individual from soliciting legal advice or representation, and the intricate application of sophisticated retaliatory pun­ ishments in reaction to individuals exercising their rights to communicate, report, file claims, and so forth, at local, state, and federal levels as infringements of their constitutionally guaranteed civil rights? When looking into the coerced removal of cases filed by the petitioner from various legal entities such as the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and nine related cases from the Superior Court of Massachu­ setts, the District of Massachusetts, the Western Dis­ trict of Washington, among other places, we notice a pattern of violations against the petitioner’s funda­ mental right to access the courts. This disturbing predicament involves an array of suspicious and ma­ nipulative behaviors that highlight a meticulous and conspiratorial pattern of punishments coming from an abusive syndicate of collated institutions; one could call it the “deep-state” or “system.” This clandestine network has infringed upon the petitioner’s rights to communicate, submit reports, and file claims, as such, with private institutions, associates, as well as n iVi-'i m,i