Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Lucine Trim v. Reward Zone USA LLC, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 22-5517 · judgment August 8, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The question presented is: Does the plain language of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (“TCPA”) definition of an Automatic Telephone Dialing System (“ATDS”) at 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1), and this Court’s holding in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, 141 S. Ct. 1163 (2021), require a plaintiff to allege that telephone dialing equipment uses a number generator to generate the telephone numbers themselves, or does it merely require the use of a random or sequential number generator to store or produce telephone numbers to be called?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Seyed Abbas Kazerounian
Kazerouni Law Group APC
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Jan 16 2024Petition DENIED.
- Dec 27 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2024.
- Dec 06 2023Brief amici curiae of Wireless Research Services, LLC and Randy Snyder filed.
- Nov 06 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 11, 2023)