Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Matthew Boermeester v. Ainsley Carry, et al.
Paid petition · Supreme Court of California, No. S263180 · judgment July 31, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whether when an educational institution that is a recipient of Federal funds seeks to impose a lengthy suspension or expulsion on a student for alleged Title IX sexual misconduct and the credibility of witnesses is material to the decisionmaker’s finding, confrontation and cross-examination of witnesses at a hearing before neutral decision-makers are necessary elements of a fair process.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Mark McClellan Hathaway
Hathaway Parker Inc
For respondent
Scott Philip Dixler
Horvitz & Levy LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Dec 11 2023Petition DENIED.
- Dec 01 2023Rescheduled.
- Dec 01 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
- Nov 08 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
- Nov 02 2023Waiver of right of respondent Ainsley Carry, et al. to respond filed.
- Oct 30 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 4, 2023)