Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Domino’s Pizza, LLC v. Edmond Carmona, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 21-55009 · judgment July 21, 2023
Before the decision, about 2.4× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Ninth Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a business petitioner.
Question presented
Whether local delivery drivers—i.e., workers who make in-state deliveries of goods in response to instate orders, and play no role in transporting those goods across borders—are nevertheless “engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” for purposes of Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act? (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Courtney Gilligan Saleski
DLA Piper LLP
For respondent
Aashish Y. Desai
Desai Law Firm, P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 3 conferences
Proceedings
- Apr 22 2024Petition DENIED.
- Apr 15 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
- Jan 03 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
- Jan 03 2024Reply of petitioner Domino’s Pizza, LLC filed. (Distributed)
- Dec 20 2023Brief of respondents Edmond Carmona, et al. in opposition filed.
- Nov 15 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 8, 2024.
- Nov 14 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 7, 2023 to January 8, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
- Nov 07 2023Response Requested. (Due December 7, 2023)
- Nov 01 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
- Oct 26 2023Waiver of right of respondent Edmond Carmona, et al. to respond filed.
- Oct 19 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 22, 2023)