Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Bahig F. Bishay
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
May a U.S. circuit concede its [dis]qualification to adjudicate matters naming the Petitioner; after the majority of its judges in regular active service so published in writing, then ardently refuse to transfer the action to another qualified] circuit for impartial adjudication of civil-rights claims presented? If the answer is to the negative, in that a circuit may not so act, should this Court exercise its supervisory authority to grant mandamus relief under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a); Rule 20 of the Rules of the U.S. Supreme Court; and Article III, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Bahig F. Bishay
For respondent
Katherine Brady Dirks
Office of the Attorney General of Massachusetts
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 08 2024Petition DENIED.
- Nov 29 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
- Nov 20 2023Waiver of right of respondents Clifford G. Anderson, Daniel M. Rabinovitz, John K. Wells to respond filed.
- Oct 27 2023Waiver of right of respondents Hon. Michael Ricciuti, et al. to respond filed.
- Oct 20 2023Waiver of right of respondents Catherine J. Savoie, David J. Reier, Nicholas J. Nesgos, Arent Fox LLP f/k/a Posternak Blankstein & Lund, and The Hamilton Company to respond filed.
- Sep 26 2023Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due November 16, 2023)