Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Tata Consultancy Services Limited, et al. v. Epic Systems Corporation
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 22-2420 · judgment July 14, 2023
Before the decision, about 2.1× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and down for a business respondent.
Questions presented
-
Whether avoided costs are available as unjust enrichment damages where they both do not reflect any actual benefit obtained by the defendant and there is no economic harm to the trade secret holder?
-
Whether a $140 million punitive damages award, on top of a $140 million unjust enrichment damages award, is excessive, where the plaintiff suffered no harm, the defendant did not benefit from the misappropriation, and the unjust enrichment damages award already served a deterrent function?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Robert N. Hochman
Sidley Austin, LLP
For respondent
Michael T. Brody
Jenner & Block LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 20 2023Petition DENIED.
- Nov 01 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
- Oct 30 2023Waiver of right of respondent Epic Systems Corporation to respond filed.
- Oct 10 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)