Karen C. Yeh Ho v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Rule 14.1(a)

1. Whether Respondent voided and denial of perma­ nent streamline mortgage modification agreement because Petitioner’s husband won’t sign the per­ manent streamline mortgage modification agree­ ment is a violation of United States Constitution 14th Amendment “nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”?

2. Whether Respondent voided and denial of perma­ nent streamline mortgage modification agreement is a violation of United States Constitution Article I Section 10 Law “Nor impairing the Obligation of Contracts”?

3. Whether consent judgment for foreclosure without Petitioner’s knowledge, consent and signature was signed by attorney representing Respondent’s law firm and attorney representing Petitioner’s law firm and State court judge is in violation of due process of clause in United States Constitution 5th Amendment “nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law” and 14th Amendment, “nor shall any State deprive any per­ son of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”?

4. Whether the foreclosure judgement amount and forfeiture of property worth far more than needed to satisfy a debt plus, interest, penalties, and costs, is a fine within the meaning of the U.S. Constitu­ tion 8th Amendment?