J. M. F. v. New Jersey Department of Treasury, Division of Pensions and Benefits

Whether ALJs violate the rule of law by depriving petitioners of their disability pensions on credibility grounds when petitioners have met their burden of proof and the questioning of their credibility is based on an ALJ’s unexplained “impression” and on a state expert’s opinion not based on medical facts.

Whether state Appellate and Supreme Courts re­ spectively deny petitioners due process of the law when: a. Affirming an ALJ’s Decision by making false fa nofifi Ar» or Iatt O l/U UV/lllVll UO UX t_>J UU.i.VJ.U.1 UW k/wxvxvxxv/x iaxavi wj failing to address petitioner’s Brief’s legal points showing that the ALJ’s Decision wasn’t based on cogent reasons. b. Ignoring a petitioner’s request to investigate a likely collusion between the Appellate Court and the agency in an ongoing appeal and later denying review of said court’s decision.

Whether state courts violate the First Amendment when sealing records on the grounds that petitioner’s privacy needs to be protected even though such privacy does not overcome the strong presumption of public ac­ cess to records and even though petitioner wants the record unsealed in order to share it with the public.