Curtiss Davis, III v. Pedro Bonilla, et al.

Whether both the US District and US Court of Appeals had inequitably applied US laws to deny restitution; as well as, a default summary judgment and punitive damages in regards to the federal civil actions filed by the Petitioner (Mr. Davis). and; that rulings to dismiss his civil action deviated from normal appellate practices by the Fourth Circuit Court to purposely deny an appeal as partisan support to "sanctuary policies” enforced by the local government of Fairfax County, VA. and; that the enforcement of these "sanctuary policies" by Fairfax County violated the civil liberties of US citizens to assist illegal immigrants in defrauding US government programs in receiving benefits to reside legally in the United States. and; that officers of the Fairfax County Police Department (FCPD) provided a false testimony to a magistrate to unconstitutionally attain a warrant to arrest an agent of the US government to assist undocumented immigrants evade apprehension and potential deportation by federal law enforcement. and; Edwin C. Roessler Jr., sought the assistance from Journalists from the Washington Post and WUSA9 News to systematically disseminate, the protected identity, of a US agent to the public to intentionally compromise covert roles and investigative activities in support to US Intelligence Agencies, which violates the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 (50 USC 421-426). t;