Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Joe Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2021-2320, 2021-2376 · judgment April 5, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The Constitution empowers Congress to incentivize innovation by granting inventors limited monopolies in exchange for the public disclosure of their inventions. U.S. Const. Art. I, § 8, Cl. 8. A patent—and the accompanying right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the disclosed invention—is a form of private property. 35 U.S.C. § 154(a)(1). The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment protects against uncompensated governmental takings of private property. U.S. Const. amend. V. Where the Federal Circuit Panel’s construction of petitioner’s patent claim was unforeseeable and unjustifiable under the circuit’s prior decisions, disrupting petitioner’s legitimate investment-backed expectations and rendering his and similarly situated patent owners’ patents worthless, does the Panel’s precedential opinion constitute a judicial taking of property in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Dariush Keyhani
Keyhani LLC
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 20 2023Petition DENIED.
- Nov 01 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
- Sep 06 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2023)