Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Adam M. Goodman, Chapter 13 Trustee v. Daniel Richard Doll
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 22-1004 · judgment January 18, 2023
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel with five or more prior petitions here, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a Tenth Circuit decision below.
Question presented
Standing trustees ensure the impartial, efficient administration of cases arising under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. Such administration includes reviewing debtors’ proposed debt-repayment plans and advising courts on whether to confirm (approve) these plans. Standing trustees perform this quasijudicial work (and more) in hundreds of Chapter 13 cases at a time. Doing this work requires trustees to maintain a staff and incur hundreds of thousands of dollars in yearly administrative expenses. The Bankruptcy Code funds these costs through a debtor-paid user fee. Before and after confirmation of their plans, Chapter 13 debtors must make regular monthly payments under their plans to the trustee for eventual disbursal by the trustee to the debtor’s creditors. 11 U.S.C. §1326(a)(1)(A). The Code dictates that standing trustees “shall collect” a percentagebased user fee “from all payments” that the trustee “receive[s] . . . under plans.” 28 U.S.C. §586(e)(2). If “a plan is not confirmed,” trustees “shall return” to the debtor any payments “not previously paid” and “not yet due and owing to creditors” minus unpaid administrative claims. 11 U.S.C. §1326(a)(2). The question presented is: Whether the Bankruptcy Code directs standing trustees to collect a user fee from debtors in every Chapter 13 case the trustee administers, including cases in which a debtor’s plan is not confirmed.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Mahesha Padmanabhan Subbaraman
Subbaraman PLLC
For respondent
Taylor Ann Rausch Meehan
Consovoy McCarthy PLLC
Proceedings
- Feb 20 2024Petition DENIED.
- Feb 12 2024Reply of petitioner Adam Goodman filed. (Distributed)
- Jan 10 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
- Dec 26 2023Brief of respondent Daniel Richard Doll in opposition filed.
- Nov 17 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 26, 2023.
- Nov 15 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 24, 2023 to December 26, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
- Oct 25 2023Response Requested. (Due November 24, 2023)
- Oct 24 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
- Oct 10 2023Brief amici curiae of Catherine E. Bauer, et al. filed.
- Sep 05 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2023)
- Aug 21 2023Application (23A45) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until September 4, 2023.
- Aug 15 2023Application (23A45) to extend further the time from August 25, 2023 to September 4, 2023, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
- Jul 19 2023Application (23A45) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until August 25, 2023.
- Jul 15 2023Application (23A45) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 26, 2023 to September 24, 2023, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.