Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
James William Hall v. Tammy O'Brien, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 22-3663 · judgment March 21, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Do a plaintiff or a defendant have a right to an oralargument in his other case if requested and to respond to the judges remarks calling the case (frivolous) and the plaintiff or defendant characterized as not (serious) before dismiss the cafee. Can any judge knowing that a plaintiff or defendant has violated (summons in a civil action) in 4/14/2022 certified mail 7018-3090-0001 8662 0148 to defendant Donald Gallick refused to sign for the district court also mailed out certified 7021-0950-0002 1207 8215. Plus on page 9 (judgment by default) Fed. R. Civ. P 12 (a) (2) or (3) in plaintiff brief cannot miss this 06/08/2022 on the Civil Docket U.S. District Court Northern District of Ohio (Akron) case 5:22-cv-00580- sl. Can a judge in the lower trial court Tammy O’Brien and attorneys for the defendants on June 27, 2022 subpoena certified mail no. # 70212720-0002-2770 1936 Subpoena July 1, 2022 delivery date July 5, 2022 to Mazanec Raskin Ryder for documents (disobedience) (rule HS to a subpoena) Title-18 U.S.C. Section 242 my rights was deprived under color of law 42 U.S. Code § 1983 deprivation.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
James William Hall
For respondent
Steven M. Hooten
Summit County Prosecutor's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 06 2023Petition DENIED.
- Oct 18 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
- Sep 21 2023Waiver of right of respondent Tammy O'Brien to respond filed.
- Sep 07 2023Waiver of right of respondent James R. Silver to respond filed.
- Aug 09 2023Waiver of right of respondent Tamara J. Todd to respond filed.
- May 31 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 5, 2023)