Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Michael Ramon Ochoa v. Arthur Levine, et al.
Paid petition · Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office, No. 240 WDA 2022 · judgment September 30, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Are the cloud-based #NetoOrganon and the dashboard tools attached as exhibits admissible as models per Rule 32 of this Court? = YES
-
Do the respondents remain in violation of both 28 Pa. Code §115 Medical Records Services and 45 CFR Parts 160 and 164 the HIPAA Privacy Rule? = YES
-
Did the respondents subvert the HIPAA Privacy Rule by stalling required disclosures for more than 10 years? = YES
-
Did the Pa. Judicial System subvert U.S. Constitution Article IV. Section I. Full Faith and Credit? Or this Court’s appellate jurisdiction over the laws and facts per Article III, Section 2, Clause 2? = YES
-
Are the Courts open per Pa. Constitution Article 1, Section 11? = NO
-
Would this be a good opportunity to review Skilling ». United States, No. 0808-1394? = YES
-
Is the preservation of truth a legitimate reason to petition this Court even if there is little possibility of certiorari being granted? = YES
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael Ramon Ochoa
For respondent
Shane Haselbarth
Marshall Dennehey, P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 30 2023Petition DENIED.
- Oct 11 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
- Sep 06 2023Waiver of right of respondents Preston G. Athey, Headmaster Zachary Lehman and The Hill School to respond filed.
- Aug 03 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 28, 2023)