Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Aleksandra Shklyar v. Carboline Company
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, No. 22-2618 · judgment February 3, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
Did the Court abuse its discretion in dismissing the amended complaint for disability discrimination and retaliation? Did the Court abuse its discretion and demonstrate bias and prejudice by adopting and implementing the same, nearly identical policies as those of defendant which gave rise to the complaint? Did the amended complaint state a cause of action for disability discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act1? Did the amended complaint state a cause of action for disability retaliation in violation of the ADA? Did the Court abuse its discretion by failing to consider the Congressional intent and standard of review for ADA pleadings by failing to review defendant’s response to determine if it expressed any ADA defense? 1 Henceforth, “ADA”.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Aleksandra Shklyar
For respondent
Benjamin D. Wood
Stinson LLP
Case
Subject area
Civil Rights (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 10, 2023 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 10 2023Petition DENIED.
- Sep 20 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
- Sep 14 2023Waiver of right of respondent Carboline Company to respond filed.
- Jun 12 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 15, 2023)