Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Arthur Lopez v. MUFG Holding Corporation, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, No. G061254 · judgment August 3, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
1.) Should Due Process of Law as mandated by the United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment be afforded to self-represented litigant Plaintiff related to Civil Case against Defendant on the Matters of Infliction of Emotional Distress and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants to the United States Bankruptcy Court and Leave to Amend Complaint? 2.) Should self-represented Plaintiff litigant Right to Appeal / review Civil Cases and Tolling Doctrines and Exceptions to res judicatas be afforded? 3.) Should Conflict of Interest discovered by Petitioner in regards to Presiding Justice Kathleen O’Leary, CA Court of Appeals 4th
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Arthur Lopez
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Linked docket
23A681
Order
Order list, October 7, 2024 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2024Petition DENIED.
- Aug 07 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
- Apr 13 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 18, 2024)
- Jan 26 2024Application (23A681) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 13, 2024.
- Jan 10 2024Application (23A681) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 13, 2024 to April 13, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.