David Timothy Johnson, Sr. v. Urvashi Foster, et al.

I Whether, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, questioned Orders amounts to unlawful denial of due process; an oppressive exercise of judicial power in excess of jurisdiction or grave abuse of discretion which is tantamount to lack of jurisdiction in the findings of law or of fact, in ruling pro se petitioner abandoned our asserted claims of violations and denial of Civil Rights, by U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Judges stating they cannot locate or find argument in plaintiff - appellant’s initial opening brief. II Whether, United States District Court - Division of Middle Georgia, Judge Clay D. Land, questioned Orders dismissing petitioner’s Complaints with prejudice as a shotgun pleading, and refusal to consider pro se petitioner’s Second Amended Complaint, amounts to an oppressive exercise of judicial power in excess of jurisdiction, unlawful denial of due process, or grave abuse of discretion which is tantamount to lack of jurisdiction in the findings of law or of fact.