Konstantinos Zografidis v. Vanessa Richards, Assistant United States Attorney, et al.

Did the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, en banc, acted in a BIAS decision in failing to reverse the District courts’ ruling by denying Petitioner’s Civil Rights Complaint (Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1331) pursuant to case #:22-cv-00631(VAB) in the District of Connecticut, of which is a derivative and a continuance of my prior cases: 16-0325-cr, and case #:21-1681-cv, with the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals?

Were all the active judges of the 2nd Circuit court of Appeals, en banc, and also the District judges of Connecticut “corruptively bias” towards the Petitioner by covering up and vindicating the Law Enforcement-DEA, and the U.S. Attorney’s office of Bridgeport, CT federal felonies (constitutional violations), as the Petitioner presented plentiful of discoveries to prove so, as observed in case #:18-cv1566(JAM) in the District of Connecticut? Also, in criminal case #:16-0325; case #:21-1681-cv; and case #:22-3197-cv, with the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals?

Did ALL the judges who presided over the Petitioners’ cases violate their sworn duty, to serve and protect the laws of our constitution, by refusing to acknowledge and then suppress the ‘fabrication of evidence’ the government presented?