Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Lyft, Inc. v. California
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, No. A166355 · judgment September 28, 2023
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel with five or more prior petitions here, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a business petitioner, and down for a state or local-government respondent.
Question presented
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state law authorizing public officials to pursue claims for individualized monetary relief in court for the benefit of individuals who agreed to resolve those claims in arbitration, thereby circumventing those individuals’ arbitration agreements.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Elaine Janet Goldenberg
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
For respondent
Joshua A. Klein
California Department of Justice
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
2 cert-stage
Related
Vide, 23-1130
Order
Order list, October 7, 2024 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2024Petition DENIED.
- Jul 10 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
- Jul 10 2024Reply of petitioner Lyft, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
- Jun 20 2024Brief of respondents California, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.
- May 20 2024Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc., et al. filed. VIDED.
- May 20 2024Brief amicus curiae of Professor George A. Bermann filed. VIDED.
- May 09 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 20, 2024, for all respondents. See Rule 30.1.
- May 08 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 20, 2024 to June 19, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
- Apr 16 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2024)