Jack Jordan v. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Whether any federal law or the U.S. Constitu­ tion authorize any federal judge to penalize or punish any person because such person stated in written fed­ eral court filings that one or more federal judges know­ ingly violated rights and freedoms expressly secured to persons by the U.S. Constitution and federal laws or that such judge(s) committed federal offenses {e.g., in 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 371, 1001, 1341, 1343, 1349, 1512 or 1519).

When an attorney challenges reciprocal dis­ barment, whether federal law or the U.S. Constitution authorize any federal court (including the U.S. Su­ preme Court) to disbar an attorney (i.e., deprive the at­ torney of his liberty and property, e.g., license to practice his profession in such court) for purported misconduct without such federal court, itself, expressly identifying the particular standard(s) of conduct such court concluded were relevant, identifying the attorney conduct that purportedly violated any such standard, identifying the facts material to proving how any such attorney conduct violated any such standard, and iden­ tifying the evidence that was admissible and admitted to prove all material facts.