Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Deana Pollard Sacks v. Texas Southern University, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 22-20474 · judgment December 15, 2023


Certiorari denied · May 13, 2024
Pre-decision estimate: 13% cert probability (95% interval 10%–18%)

Before the decision, about 3.2× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Fifth Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).

Questions presented

Petitioner Deana Pollard Sacks was a tenured professor at the Thurgood Marshall School of Law (TMSL) at Texas Southern University (TSU) until

  1. She filed two lawsuits against TSU, Sacks-I in 2018 and Sacks-II in 2022. Sacks alleged violations of Title VII for sex discrimination, a hostile environment, and retaliation, inter alia. The Title VII gender-discrimination claims were dismissed in both cases for failure to state a claim and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed. This petition concerns Sacks-I. The petition for certiorari for Sacks-II was filed February 14, 2024. The District Court rejected continuing violations and granted summary judgment for all defendants as to all claims other than the non-retaliation EPA claim against TSU. The court did not allow Petitioner to discover female wage data or to amend her complaint to add EPA comparators once she discovered which male professors were paid higher wages, among many other issues that Petitioner appealed. The following issues are presented:

  2. Whether a federal court may reject the doctrine of continuing violations in a Title VII hostile-workenvironment case and eliminate from consideration all Complaint allegations that occurred more than 300 days prior to the date plaintiff filed an EEOC charge.

  3. Whether a federal court may deprive an EPA plaintiff of female wage data and require her to identify male comparators before she knows which males were paid higher wages.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
David James Sacks
Sacks Law Firm

For respondent
Andrew Harris
Office of the Attorney General of Texas

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. May 13 2024
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 23 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
  3. Apr 18 2024
    Waiver of right of respondent Texas Southern University, et al. to respond filed.
  4. Mar 13 2024
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 18, 2024)