Bruce Ellis, et al. v. City of Clarksdale, Mississippi, et al.

This Petition presents a Federal Question that could have and harmonize conflicting decisions in the Federal Circuit Courts and could establish precedential value whether Federal Rule Civil Procedure 5.1(b) requires the Court under 28 U.S.C. § 2403(a) to certify to the appropriate attorney general that an Act of congress (AEDPA) the Antiterrorism Effective Death Penalty Act has been called into ques­ tion and presents an unconstitutional taking under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment, violations of the vagueness Doctrine, and shall be served on the Solicitor General of the United States, Room 5616, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20530-0001?

This Petition presents a Federal Question and could have precedential value in the Court deter­ mining whether the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments impose “Equivalent Due Process Limits” on Court Jurisdiction?

This Petition also presents a Federal Question whether Federal Rule Civil Procedure 5.1(b) requires the Court under 28 U.S.C. § 2403(a) to certify to the appropriate attorney general that an Act of congress the Fifth and Fourteenth has been called into question whether the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guar­ antee equivalent Due process of law and shall be served on the Solicitor General of the United States, Room 5616, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20530-0001?

This Petition presents a Federal Question and Plaintiffs-Petitioners wish to be more fully informed whether a Trial Court Judge’s ‘mistake’ is reviewable