Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Arizona, Plaintiff v. Richard Sackler, et al.
Original jurisdiction
Leave to file denied · December 9, 2019
Counsel of record
For petitioner
—
For respondent
Benjamin Shalom Kaminetzky
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Dec 09 2019Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint DENIED.
- Nov 20 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
- Nov 18 2019Reply of plaintiff State of Arizona filed.
- Nov 01 2019Letter of October 30, 2019, from counsel for defendants Richard S. Sackler, et al. and counsel for defendants Mortimer D.A. Sackler et al. received.
- Oct 30 2019Brief of defendants Purdue Pharma, L.P., and Purdue Pharma Inc. in opposition filed.
- Sep 26 2019Brief amicus curiae of States of Ohio, Alaska, Louisiana, North Dakota, and Utah filed.
- Sep 06 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted, and the time is extended to and including October 30, 2019, for all defendants.
- Sep 04 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 30, 2019 to October 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jul 31 2019Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint filed.