Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Justin Marcus Zinman v. California
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, No. B313764 · judgment August 4, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whether allowing a Progressive political ideology to influence the law violates the Establishment clause of the First Amendment? Whether the State of California's assault and threat laws adequately incorporate the Federal Constitutions Speech provision under the Second Amendment? Whether State Secrets should be upheld in this case which involves an active United States Defense Consul who is engaging in Homeland Defense activity?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Justin Zinman
For respondent
Rene Judkiewicz
California Attorney General's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- May 22 2023Petition DENIED.
- May 02 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
- Apr 25 2023Waiver of right of respondent The People of the State of California to respond filed.
- Dec 15 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 1, 2023)