Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Aparna Vashisht-Rota v. Diana Hagen, Justice, Supreme Court of Utah, et al.
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Utah, No. 20220971-SC · judgment March 6, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
If Mr. Howell’s mom knows the Court, is that a fair forum for Petitioner?
-
Should the Speak Out Act result in nationwide expansion of sexual harassment statute of limitations to a standard of 3 years?
-
Should the Court consider retroactive application to 2015 to allow victims to come forward based on the Speak Out Act?
-
Should the Court adopt a nationwide standard for litigation privilege for sexual harassment victims?
-
Should the judges that allow such deviance from trial processes be allowed to have their jobs? By what process can they be removed?
-
What is the way to get reparations for lost time from the state for botching a fair trial and allowing involuntary servitude?
-
If the underlying case had allegations to Human Trafficking for Labor, then how can Petitioner allege this without retaliation?
-
Did the Court go too far in not removing the qualified immunity doctrine from 42 U.S.C. §1983?
-
Does the Utah Court’s trial delay a use of excessive force; excessive sanctions a violation of 1st, 8th and 14th amendment of the constitution in light of its refusal to allow evidentiary hearings and withhold money due by contract and statute?
-
Should Utah lose its comity till it brings up its services given the total denial of services and because Utah wrote a strong letter in support of harassment victims?
-
If two women have died due to Utah's law enforcement misconduct, Gabby Petito and Zhifan Dong, is Utah safe for any woman of any color?
-
Should the Court consider naming the expansion of harassment reporting statute of limitations and retroactive application to Hill, Dong, and Petito Apology?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Aparna Vashisht-Rota
For respondent
Stanford Edward Purser
Utah Attorney General's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jul 24 2023Rehearing DENIED.
- Jun 29 2023DISTRIBUTED.
- Jun 09 2023Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Jun 05 2023Petition DENIED.
- May 16 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
- Apr 26 2023Waiver of right of respondent Sean D. Reyes, Utah Attorney General to respond filed.
- Mar 07 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 28, 2023)