Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
BYD Motors Inc. v. Soderholm Sales and Leasing, Inc.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 21-16778, 21-16779 · judgment November 10, 2022
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Ninth Circuit decision below, a dissent in the court below, and a business petitioner, and down for a business respondent.
Question presented
Whether the Memorandum disposition, where the majority of the split appellate panel affirmed the district court’s appealed decision without having conducted a de novo review of the district court’s interpretation of the Hawaii statute at issue, conflicts with Salve Regina College v. Russell, 499 U.S. 225, 111 S. Ct. 1217, 113 L. Ed. 2d 190 (1991).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Christian Keola Adams
Adams Krek LLP
For respondent
Jeffrey Philip Miller
Miller Shea, LLLP
Case
Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, May 30, 2023 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- May 30 2023Petition DENIED.
- May 25 2023Stipulation to withdraw the petition submitted. (Received June 1, 2023)
- May 09 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
- May 03 2023Reply of petitioner BYD Motors Inc. filed.
- Apr 24 2023Brief of respondent Soderholm Sales and Leasing, Inc. in opposition filed.
- Mar 22 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 24, 2023)