Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Robert R. Snyder v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District, No. F081087 · judgment August 15, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
• Did the California corrections agency exceed the bounds of its statutory authority when they wrote an administrative regulation without any sort of predicate timeframe? • Can a state law without a timeframe for property reissuance, pass the reasonableness test? What would constitute an unreasonable delay in that context? • Can review courts safely defer to administrative interpretation that does not exist? Does the omission of a substantive predicate—to guide decision makers— constitute an ambiguity and/or a failure to interpret (the governing authority) for Chevron purposes? • Does an agency actually possess discretion to promulgate and then refuse to amend.., one sided administrative codes—those which result in casual and often deprivations of prisoner’s chattels? • Is the term ministerial duty strictly limited to the text of agency-regulations—under a state's administrative procedures—or can it be derived also from duties arising out of statutory and/or constitutional provisions?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Robert R. Snyder
For respondent
—
Proceedings
- May 22 2023Petition DENIED.
- May 02 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
- Mar 15 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2023)
- Jan 24 2023Application (22A656) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 18, 2023.
- Jan 12 2023Application (22A656) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 7, 2023 to March 18, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.