Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Jay Goodley v. Charles M. Greene

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 21-13978 · judgment September 9, 2022


Certiorari denied · April 24, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

Preface A Florida state circuit court judge was automatically disqualified Z>y7awimmediately upon a case being assigned to him by an Order ofRecusal. The Plaintiff was a litigant in the case. Upon the Defendant’s recusal the case was reassigned to cm other judge by the clerk of the court. After the judge reassignment the Defendant reversed his recusal by entering an order he titled Amended Order ofRecusal. He then used this Amended Order of Recusal as a conduit for approximately two years to fully reengage in the very case in which he was recused from hv taking the following actions; changing laws, holding hearings, entering orders and conferring with otherjudges in the case. Questions

  1. Whether a person can be treated equally under the law when a judge is changing the law?

  2. Whether it is a normal judicial function for a judge who is automatically disqualified by law, via a court order and with that case having been reassigned to another judge by the clerk of the court, to then be changing laws, holding hearings, entering orders and conferring with other judges in the very case he/she was recused from?

  3. Whether a judge is still operating in a “judicial capacity” when presiding in a case afterhelshe has been disqualified from that case and with that case having been reassigned to a new presiding judge? (0

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jay Goodley

For respondent
Christopher Sutter
Florida Office of the Attorney General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Apr 24 2023
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 05 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
  3. Mar 21 2023
    Waiver of right of respondent Charles M. Greene to respond filed.
  4. Feb 11 2023
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2023)