Ryan Wollner v. Pearpop Inc.

Under the U.S. Const. Amendment 14 § 1, can a state court fundamentally & substantially alter their well-established legal procedural processes on a citizen of the United States of America (“Petitioner”) in the middle of a civil action, without any notice to the Petitioner, in which, those changed processes were only applied to the petitioner’s action and no other of the previous or proceeding same type of actions in that state—Can those alterations then be used to deprive the Petitioner of his protected liberties and permanently deprive him of his property without a trial as required in that state’s constitution?

Under the U.S. Const. Amendment 6 and 14, can a state court interfere and deprive a person of their right to counsel during a civil proceeding?

Under U.S. Const. Amendment 5 and 14 can the Petitioner be compelled by a court to be a witness against himself, when It had been clearly established that the counter-party was in contact with a federal district attorney’s office, and were using the informa­ tion gained in an attempt to have him arrested so they could take his property?

Under the U.S. Const. Amendment 6 and 14, can a state’s Supreme Court deprive a person of their right to counsel in a civil appellate proceeding?

Under the U.S. Const. Amendment 14 § 1, can a state court deprive access to the Petitioner’s digital document records via the state’s digital online record keeping platform while the Petitioner is appealing the trial court’s decision with that state’s Supreme Court?