Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Mobilize the Message, LLC, et al. v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 21-55855 · judgment October 11, 2022
Before the decision, about 1.6× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel with five or more prior petitions here, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and a circuit split argued in the petition, and down for a state or local-government respondent.
Question presented
California applies different work-classification rules to canvassers depending on the subject, function, and purpose of their speech. The state thus allows canvassers promoting consumer products and services to work as independent contractors, but it classifies canvassers promoting political campaigns as employees whose employment relationships are governed by more onerous and expensive laws. Likewise, workers who distribute or deliver state-designated newspapers and related publications may work as independent contractors, while workers who deliver or distribute political campaign material may not. The additional burdens California places on political canvassing and the distribution of political material deny Petitioners the ability to hire independent contractors, and thus prevent Petitioners from circulating ballot petitions and campaigning. The question presented is: Whether regulating canvassing and the delivery of printed material based on that speech’s content, function, or purpose implicates the First Amendment.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Alan Gura
Institute for Free Speech
For respondent
Teresa Alexandra Reed Dippo
California Department of Justice
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
4 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Jun 20 2023Petition DENIED.
- May 30 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
- May 26 2023Reply of petitioners Mobilize the Message, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
- May 10 2023Brief of respondent Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California in opposition filed.
- Apr 10 2023Brief amici curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation, et al. filed.
- Apr 10 2023Brief amici curiae of The Independent Institute, et al. filed.
- Apr 07 2023Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.
- Apr 05 2023Brief amicus curiae of Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association filed.
- Mar 27 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 10, 2023.
- Mar 24 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 10, 2023 to May 10, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
- Mar 08 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 10, 2023)