David Archer v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., et al.

(1) The trial and appellate court ruled against Petitioner on rehearing filed under Florida rules of civil procedures 1.540 and 1.530 and 28 U.S.C. 455(a) and (b) for biased ruling filed for disqualification of judge for the reentry of default knowingly that Re­ spondents showed no meritorious defense to vacate the previous judge warning, that default be entered. Peti­ tioner petition for direct Appeal filed in Florida Fourth District Court to the United States Supreme Court and it was redirected by the Clerk of Court acting together under ‘the color of law’ and sent to Florida Supreme Court and Subsequently, dismissed in admitting it lacked Jurisdiction. The first question presented is rather any and all judges and officers of the court who were sworn by the constitution to uphold the law, and who contravened the law under 42 U.S.C. SECTION 1983 are immune from “conflict of interest or lack of impartiality” when judges ruled out of jurisdiction, should any court in­ dulged in prejudiced cases causing irreparable harm, or failed to apply the remedy as substantiated court dockets records holds the answers to Justify cor­ rective measures to ensure both injustice and ineffec­ tive administration preservation of a fair trial in a civil trial case be maintain in remedying inadvertent and intentional misconduct by trial Attorneys and judges. Fletcher v. Tomlinson. #16-4399 (8th circuit. 2018) 18 U.S.C. section 242. ACTING UNDER COLOR OF LAW