Hiram I. Perez Soto v. Maite D. Oronoz-Rodriguez, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, et al.

I filed a complaint in the Federal District Court of Puerto Rico in March 2019 19CV-1266 Leading case, and 19CV-1774. I wanted to obtain a declaratory judgment against the justices of the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico because I was disbarred without giving me the opportunity to defend myself. The Commissioner named by the Supreme Court refused to give the opportunity to explain the five ethical complaints and five recusal motions I filed against judges. There is the constitutional right to file ethical complaints and recusal motions against judges with specific facts, reasonable basis and with respect, see In Re Little, 404US533; Holt v. Virginia, 381US25; In Re Cardona Alvarez, 116DPR895. I filed the complaint under 42USC1983. There is no immunity for declaratory judgment and under the facts of this case for injunction remedy, see Heimbacke v. Lyons, 597F2d344; Allen v. Debello, 861F3d433; Clay v. Olstain, 210US District Court Lexis 111395; Khun v. Thompson, 304FedSupp2dl313; Tesmerv. Kowasky, 114FedSupp622; Monaham v. Savatis, 2014 US District Lexis 19840; Cain v. City of New Orleans, 184FedSup 3rd 379; Page v. Glady, 78FedSuppl207; Snow v. King, 2018 US District Lexis 1613; Allee v. Medrano, 416US802; Sibly v. Lamb, 437F3dl077; Littleton v. Berbling, 468F3d389; Association of Medical Malpractice v. Torres Nieves, 2013 US District Lexis. Under the facts of this case there is no immunity for an injunction decree where no declara­ tory judgment can be obtained due to the bias of judges. See Owen v. Cowan, 2018 US District Lexis 2714; Chults v. Alabama, 2018 US District Lexis 228824. When there is a reasonable basis of bias of state justices and judges their judicial decisions and judgments can be voided under a declaratory (i)