John E. Reardon v. New Jersey, et al.

Questions for Review Are Judges Liable for Equity, Prospective and/or Legal relief when they Usurped, Lacked, or Lost their Jurisdiction, Discretion or Violated Common, Case or Statute, Law Mandates/Ministerial Acts or have acted as Trespassers in the law or who fail to comply with said Mandates,U.S. v Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 654, 1898 and Bogan v Scott'Karris, 523 U.S. 44, 51-52, 1888 and/or deny a Plaintiff of his 1st, 4th’ 5th, 6th’ 8th, 9th and 14th Amendment Rights to the Common Law and are they liable for Intentional Violations of Rights, and would Federal Judges be civilly liable for violating this mandate or is the injured only entitled to have their decisions, opinions and orders declared void and unenforceable? Does 42 U.S.C. §1983 remove Absolute Immunity when the injured party does not have declaratory relief available in the State and given the Legislature abrogated absolute immunity for Judges under such a position and requires the Judge prove he has absolute immunity by proving the Plaintiff has declaratory relief in the State? Does an accused deal with Judges in their official capacity when they have pre-conceived fictitious and bogus charges when said Judges were being actively sued by the accused and with the aid of all Police officers, 4 other trial Judges and 5 Appellate Court Judges to Rail Road the accused by this vast conspiracy to retal -iate against him or vent their spleens against the accused and have turned a criminal trial into a Kangaroo Court Proceeding? Would said officials be immune under these circumstances? A144, Statement 66, Pierson v Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 562