Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Weixing V. Wang v. Brandywyne Common Condominium
Paid petition · Supreme Court of New Hampshire, No. 2021-0399 · judgment October 18, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Solely with the lies and fabricated numbers on paper, without even one evidence, how can Petitioner be ordered to pay $47,319.86?
-
In a civil case, is the Judge allowed to stop com pletely and prevent Discovery repeatedly by violating the court procedure and Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 to help Respondent to cheat with solely lies?
-
Is the Judge allowed to repeatedly violate Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, not only 100% completely denied all Petitioner’s Motion to compel without reason, even Respondent never objected the motions, but also never rule on two Petitioner’s Motion to compel forever?
-
Is the Judge allowed to violate the court Procedure, the Fed. R. Civ. P. 40 and Fed. R. Evid. 602, totally and permanently prevent any trial in this case?
-
Is the Judge allowed being the backup and Defending Lawyer for Respondent, and asking what Respondent wanted, then 100% granted all to Respon dent?
-
Is the Judge allowed to be the Advisor for Respondent and in his 5/18/2021 order asked Respond ent to fabricate new lies on lien, which never existed and neither in any of Respondent’s four Motions for Summary Judgements.
-
Why after having concluded all three “witness es” have no personal knowledge on the fines, but the Judge still granted $14,156.86 to Respondent in the final order, based on those lies from fake “witnesses” who were not there at all, by violating Fed. R. Evid. 602 willfully?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Weixing Wang
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jun 20 2023Rehearing DENIED.
- May 30 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
- May 16 2023Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Apr 24 2023Petition DENIED.
- Apr 05 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
- Feb 09 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 20, 2023)