Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Mark T. Stinson, Sr.

IFP petition

Dismissed · October 2, 2023

For petitioner
Mark Stinson Sr.

For respondent
—

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

Oct 02 2023
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Jul 06 2023
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
May 09 2023
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 20, 2023)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Petition Appendix Proof of Service