Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Nathan D. Crisp v. Georgia, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 21-14190 · judgment August 23, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
a. Federal Questions * A United States Court of Appeals has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Honorable Supreme Court. Can the State of Georgia use a perjury and forgery guilty plea and perjury First Offender to bypass Petitioner Sgt. Crisp’s jury trial and due process rights to convict him? Can Appeals Court and District Courts support a Void Judgment? W
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Nathan D. Crisp
For respondent
Stephen John Petrany
Georgia Department of Law
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, April 17, 2023 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Apr 17 2023Petition DENIED.
- Mar 22 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
- Mar 09 2023Waiver of right of respondents Gwinnett County, Georgia; Tuwanda Rush Williams to respond filed.
- Feb 14 2023Waiver of right of respondents Georgia, et al. to respond filed.
- Dec 20 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 13, 2023)