Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Nathan D. Crisp v. Georgia, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 21-14190 · judgment August 23, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
a. Federal Questions * A United States Court of Appeals has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Honorable Supreme Court. Can the State of Georgia use a perjury and forgery guilty plea and perjury First Offender to bypass Petitioner Sgt. Crisp’s jury trial and due process rights to convict him? Can Appeals Court and District Courts support a Void Judgment? W
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Nathan D. Crisp
For respondent
Stephen John Petrany
Georgia Department of Law
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 17 2023Petition DENIED.
- Mar 22 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
- Mar 09 2023Waiver of right of respondents Gwinnett County, Georgia; Tuwanda Rush Williams to respond filed.
- Feb 14 2023Waiver of right of respondents Georgia, et al. to respond filed.
- Dec 20 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 13, 2023)