Usha Jain, et vir v. David Barker, et al.

This case presents an important question of Federal statutes designed by Congress for minority citizens of color and ethnicity in the country to get fair and impartial justice for their federal rights by removing the case from the state court to the federal court per 28 USC § 1443. This case involves defying and defrauding Florida Statutes FS 57.105 and disobeying Congress’s Statutes (Federal Statutes of jurisdiction 28 U.S.C. §§ 1446 (d) and 1447 (c). This case is also important for violation of the due process rights of a naturalized minority doctor who was demanded to attend the hearing outside the noticed time without the valid receipt of the remand order while working on an emergency patient with multiple injuries, 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America (section one). 1. This Court should resolve the question of the law, whether the state court’s jurisdiction continues during the removal period and whether state court proceedings and order should be void which are entered during the removal period on a subsequent petition for removal, filed after a year on a different matter and on different grounds. Whether Judge can make an exception in following the express language of Federal Removal Statute 28 U.S.C. § 1446 (d) which explicitly states, that proceedings and orders entered by a state trial court during the removal period is "void". The question needs