Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Alejandro Evaristo Perez v. LinkedIn Corporation
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 21-15234 · judgment November 18, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
The original questions were “Whether the excommunication of an Honorable US War Veteran (and paying customer) by Fallen Federal Judges and unpatriotic Corporatistas for the evil Chinese Communist Party is a California Anti’S LAPP violation or Federal Treason? And how many thousands of Americans have to die from a CCP bioweapon pandemic developed in the Wuhan P4 Virology Center before Fallen Federal Judges acknowledge it as a ‘Topic of Public Issue/Interest’? And did such suppression aid the CCP’s bioweapon pandemic further infesting and killings thousands of Americans?” Now, we have additional questions before the US Supreme Court, because the original questions were rejected in malice when Rule 40 (Veterans, Seamen, and Military Cases) was violated when rejecting multiple “Motion For Leave To Proceed As An Honorable Us Veteran”. Additional questions arise like “Do we need Martial Law to enforce Rule 40 and elected real Patriotic
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Alejandro Evaristo Perez
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
First Amendment (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, April 17, 2023 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Apr 17 2023Petition DENIED.
- Mar 22 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
- Apr 27 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 6, 2023)