Alejandro Evaristo Perez v. LinkedIn Corporation

The original questions were “Whether the excommunication of an Honorable US War Veteran (and paying customer) by Fallen Federal Judges and unpatriotic Corporatistas for the evil Chinese Communist Party is a California Anti’S LAPP violation or Federal Treason? And how many thousands of Americans have to die from a CCP bioweapon pandemic developed in the Wuhan P4 Virology Center before Fallen Federal Judges acknowledge it as a ‘Topic of Public Issue/Interest’? And did such suppression aid the CCP’s bioweapon pandemic further infesting and killings thousands of Americans?” Now, we have additional questions before the US Supreme Court, because the original questions were rejected in malice when Rule 40 (Veterans, Seamen, and Military Cases) was violated when rejecting multiple “Motion For Leave To Proceed As An Honorable Us Veteran”. Additional questions arise like “Do we need Martial Law to enforce Rule 40 and elected real Patriotic