Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jerald Hammann v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Minnesota, No. A21-1022 · judgment August 17, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The first question presented is whether a lower court is obligated to abide by the law of the case even if it claims the appellate court erred. The second question presented is whether a dismissal with prejudice jurisdictionally precludes a district court from hearing a motion to vacate judgment filed pursuant to Rule 60.02. The third question presented is whether the appellate court erred in dismissing the appeal. The fourth question presented is whether existing judicial procedures are adequate to protect individual constitutional rights.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jerald A. Hammann
For respondent
Kristina H. Kaluza
Dykema Gossett, PLLC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 03 2022Petition DENIED.
- Aug 10 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
- Jul 29 2022Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
- Sep 28 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 25, 2022)