Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Melina Darzzete Guillen-Perez v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 22-60108 · judgment September 30, 2022

GVR'd · June 26, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Melina Darzzete Guillen-Perez

For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jul 28 2023
    Judgment issued.
    Main Document
  2. Jun 26 2023
    Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, 598 U. S. ___ (2023).
  3. Jun 06 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
  4. May 31 2023
    Reply of petitioner Melina Darzzete Guillen-Perez filed.
  5. May 17 2023
    Memorandum of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General filed.
  6. Apr 13 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 17, 2023.
  7. Apr 12 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 17, 2023 to May 17, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
  8. Mar 23 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 17, 2023.
  9. Mar 22 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 24, 2023 to April 17, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
  10. Feb 15 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 24, 2023.
  11. Feb 14 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 22, 2023 to March 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
  12. Nov 09 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 22, 2023)
  13. Nov 09 2022
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.